<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>sci.math.research Google Group</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.se/group/sci.math.research</link>
  <description>Discussion of current mathematical research. (Moderated)</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>Call for papers XA2010</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.se/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/60360d90c80fbf2d/b377321803ac828c?show_docid=b377321803ac828c</link>
  <description>
  XA2010 &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON &lt;br&gt; COMPUTER SCIENCES &amp;amp; APPLICATIONS&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; 3rd Edition &lt;br&gt; Timi ?oara, Rom?nia, September 24-25, 2010 &lt;br&gt; AIM &lt;br&gt; The 3rd European Conference on Computer Sciences and Applications &lt;br&gt; intends to stimulate the research activity and to establish &lt;br&gt; interactions between Romanian and foreign researchers, teachers, B.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.se/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/60360d90c80fbf2d/b377321803ac828c?show_docid=b377321803ac828c</guid>
  <author>
  afor...@gmail.com
  (afortis@gmail.com)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 15 mar 2010 13:40:50 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Nine papers published by Geometry &amp; Topology Publications</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.se/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/dbadcf5cd5da1f3b/ec6f90a712dd6791?show_docid=ec6f90a712dd6791</link>
  <description>
  Seven papers have been published by Algebraic &amp;amp; Geometric Topology &lt;br&gt; (1) Algebraic &amp;amp; Geometric Topology 10 (2010) 525-530 &lt;br&gt; Faithfulness of a functor of Quillen &lt;br&gt; by William G Dwyer, Andrei Radulescu-Banu and Sebastian Thomas &lt;br&gt; URL: &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.msp.warwick.ac.uk/agt/2010/10-01/p015.xhtml&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; DOI: 10.2140/agt.2010.10.525
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.se/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/dbadcf5cd5da1f3b/ec6f90a712dd6791?show_docid=ec6f90a712dd6791</guid>
  <author>
  g...@msp.warwick.ac.uk
  (Geometry and Topology)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 14 mar 2010 02:24:30 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: decomposing rationals</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.se/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/17b494704c12939f/0230a0643323c6ae?show_docid=0230a0643323c6ae</link>
  <description>
  If a and b are rational, &lt;br&gt; this becomes an integer linear programming problem in two variables. &lt;br&gt; Such things are solvable in polynomial time. &lt;br&gt; I don&#39;t remember details. &lt;br&gt; I think that you can solve the linear relaxation &lt;br&gt; and plug away with Gomory fractional cuts. &lt;br&gt; Selecting the approximations could be tricky.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.se/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/17b494704c12939f/0230a0643323c6ae?show_docid=0230a0643323c6ae</guid>
  <author>
  henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu
  (Mike)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 12 mar 2010 22:06:54 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: minimum height of a 0-1 simplex</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.se/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/a353566b7cd440e7/4c78c371b1e28497?show_docid=4c78c371b1e28497</link>
  <description>
  The above is roughly 1/n, but there are worse examples: &lt;br&gt; e_j for j in 1..k &lt;br&gt; k &lt;br&gt; SUM e_j + e_L for L in k+1..n &lt;br&gt; j=1 &lt;br&gt; k n &lt;br&gt; The vertices satisfy SUM x_j + (1-k) SUM x_j = 1 &lt;br&gt; j=1 j=k+1 &lt;br&gt; For k=2n/3, the distance to zero is roughly sqrt(27/(4n**3)).
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.se/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/a353566b7cd440e7/4c78c371b1e28497?show_docid=4c78c371b1e28497</guid>
  <author>
  henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu
  (Mike)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 12 mar 2010 19:13:15 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Call for Papers Reminder (extended): The World Congress on Engineering WCE 2010</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.se/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/c1648296576bdefb/d363a7c27d7b263f?show_docid=d363a7c27d7b263f</link>
  <description>
  CFP: The World Congress on Engineering WCE 2010 &lt;br&gt; WCE 2010: London, U.K., 30 June - 2 July, 2010 &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.iaeng.org/WCE2010&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; Draft Paper Submission Deadline (extended): 18 March, 2010 &lt;br&gt; The WCE 2010 is organized by International Association of Engineers &lt;br&gt; (IAENG), a non-profit international association for the engineers and
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.se/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/c1648296576bdefb/d363a7c27d7b263f?show_docid=d363a7c27d7b263f</guid>
  <author>
  imecs_2...@iaeng.org
  (IMECS 2008)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 12 mar 2010 10:42:22 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: minimum height of a 0-1 simplex</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.se/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/a353566b7cd440e7/b0576937d621d2da?show_docid=b0576937d621d2da</link>
  <description>
  That is what I get, also. &lt;br&gt; The base satisfies the linear equation &lt;br&gt; n-1 &lt;br&gt; SUM x[j] + (2-n)*x[n] = 1 &lt;br&gt; j=1 &lt;br&gt; Lower bound, anyone?
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.se/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/a353566b7cd440e7/b0576937d621d2da?show_docid=b0576937d621d2da</guid>
  <author>
  henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu
  (Mike)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 10 mar 2010 19:48:09 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: minimum height of a 0-1 simplex</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.se/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/a353566b7cd440e7/b6160a9cf88414d8?show_docid=b6160a9cf88414d8</link>
  <description>
  I&#39;m not sure what this means, &lt;br&gt; but I think that it is not true even in three dimension. &lt;br&gt; that a minimal-height-defining line segment of a &lt;br&gt; tetrahedron lies within the tetrahedron. &lt;br&gt; Consider a tetrahedron with the following vertices: &lt;br&gt; (0, 0, 0), (3, 2, 0), (3, -2, 0) and (4, 0, 1). &lt;br&gt; Its minimal-height-defining segment is (4, 0, 1)_(4, 0, 0).
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.se/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/a353566b7cd440e7/b6160a9cf88414d8?show_docid=b6160a9cf88414d8</guid>
  <author>
  henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu
  (Mike)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 10 mar 2010 12:37:27 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: minimum height of a 0-1 simplex</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.se/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/a353566b7cd440e7/fd94a62c6799b29a?show_docid=fd94a62c6799b29a</link>
  <description>
  Yes, but it seems I made a mistake there, as the height-defining &lt;br&gt; segment &lt;br&gt; does not always lie inside the simplex. &lt;br&gt; However, it does so, if the simplex has the property that all angles &lt;br&gt; between &lt;br&gt; edges are at most \pi/2. &lt;br&gt; Now for a simplex with vertices in {0,1}^n this condition is &lt;br&gt; satisfied! &lt;br&gt; By symmetry, it is enough to check this at the vertex zero.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.se/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/a353566b7cd440e7/fd94a62c6799b29a?show_docid=fd94a62c6799b29a</guid>
  <author>
  corbenn...@googlemail.com
  (Corbennick)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 10 mar 2010 12:37:27 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: minimum height of a 0-1 simplex</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.se/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/a353566b7cd440e7/dc33a76711be5765?show_docid=dc33a76711be5765</link>
  <description>
  no, is not. &lt;br&gt; For example, consider the simplex spanned by zero, e=e_1+...+e_n, e_1, &lt;br&gt; e_2,...,e_{n-1}, &lt;br&gt; where e_1,...,e_n is the standard basis. &lt;br&gt; A calculation shows that the vertex at zero has height equal to 1/ &lt;br&gt; sqrt(n-1+(n-2)^2) &lt;br&gt; which for n&amp;gt;3 is less that 1/sqrt(n).
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.se/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/a353566b7cd440e7/dc33a76711be5765?show_docid=dc33a76711be5765</guid>
  <author>
  anton.deit...@googlemail.com
  (Anton)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 10 mar 2010 12:37:29 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Whitehead Groups of Short Exact Sequence</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.se/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/978e52094e25f637/4ca3566c94cfd55d?show_docid=4ca3566c94cfd55d</link>
  <description>
  Hello, all! &lt;br&gt; The Whitehead group of a group G, Wh(G), is a functor from the category &lt;br&gt; of (finitely presented?) groups to the category of Abelian groups. A &lt;br&gt; reference is _A Course in Simple Homotopy Theory_ by Cohen. &lt;br&gt; If I have a short exact sequence of finitely presented groups 1 -&amp;gt; K -&amp;gt; G &lt;br&gt; -&amp;gt; Q -&amp;gt; 1, and I take the Whitehead torsion of the sequence, forming Wh
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.se/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/978e52094e25f637/4ca3566c94cfd55d?show_docid=4ca3566c94cfd55d</guid>
  <author>
  wildstar...@hotmail.com
  (Jeffrey Rolland)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 10 mar 2010 12:37:28 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: minimum height of a 0-1 simplex</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.se/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/a353566b7cd440e7/8bca9e7956636d68?show_docid=8bca9e7956636d68</link>
  <description>
  Excellent news. Thanks much. &lt;br&gt; I&#39;m having trouble following the proof, though. &lt;br&gt; I&#39;ll get back to it when I&#39;m not supposed to be working. &lt;br&gt; The crucial point that I didn&#39;t think of. &lt;br&gt; Once I can prove that both ends of the height-defining segment are in &lt;br&gt; n-cube, &lt;br&gt; the rest is easy.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.se/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/a353566b7cd440e7/8bca9e7956636d68?show_docid=8bca9e7956636d68</guid>
  <author>
  henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu
  (Mike)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 09 mar 2010 18:12:37 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Do free abelian groups embed into connected semisimple complex lie groups?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.se/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/2b917c222e8d1597/7f38d70c7f23d13f?show_docid=7f38d70c7f23d13f</link>
  <description>
  Any such Lie group contains a complex torus isomorphic to C^*. &lt;br&gt; This group contains a subgroup isomorphic to the additive group R &lt;br&gt; of reals. Now let n be a natural number and choose v_1,...,v_n in R &lt;br&gt; which are linearly independent over Q. &lt;br&gt; Then the group Z v_1 + ... + Z v_n is free abelian of rank n and
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.se/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/2b917c222e8d1597/7f38d70c7f23d13f?show_docid=7f38d70c7f23d13f</guid>
  <author>
  corbenn...@googlemail.com
  (Corbennick)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 09 mar 2010 18:12:36 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: minimum height of a 0-1 simplex</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.se/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/a353566b7cd440e7/6780bad50ad65781?show_docid=6780bad50ad65781</link>
  <description>
  The lower bound is 1/sqrt(n). &lt;br&gt; Proof as follows. Let e_1,...,e_n be the standard basis of R^n. &lt;br&gt; Let s be a simplex of dimension n in R^n. &lt;br&gt; The minimal height is taken at a vertex v_1 which lies opposite to a &lt;br&gt; face F of maximal area. &lt;br&gt; (This is so since the volume of the simplex is height times area(F) &lt;br&gt; times dimension factor.)
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.se/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/a353566b7cd440e7/6780bad50ad65781?show_docid=6780bad50ad65781</guid>
  <author>
  corbenn...@googlemail.com
  (Corbennick)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 09 mar 2010 16:26:40 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>minimum height of a 0-1 simplex</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.se/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/a353566b7cd440e7/c49e498129250317?show_docid=c49e498129250317</link>
  <description>
  What is the minimum height of a full dimensional n-simplex whose &lt;br&gt; vertices are members {0, 1}**n ? &lt;br&gt; Equivalently, what is the minimum non-zero distance to the origin from &lt;br&gt; a hyperplane defined by members of {0, 1}**n ? &lt;br&gt; The answer is at most 1/sqrt(n) . &lt;br&gt; The corner simplex provides an example. &lt;br&gt; A smaller answer might be possible if the simplex is oblique enough
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.se/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/a353566b7cd440e7/c49e498129250317?show_docid=c49e498129250317</guid>
  <author>
  henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu
  (Mike)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 08 mar 2010 00:16:08 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: delta function as a continuous linear map?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.se/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/4613fb415a76de19/b96c55f9f2cc7f74?show_docid=b96c55f9f2cc7f74</link>
  <description>
  Oh now I see. Thanks G.A and Dan for pointing out the caveat in my &lt;br&gt; argument.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.se/group/sci.math.research/browse_thread/thread/4613fb415a76de19/b96c55f9f2cc7f74?show_docid=b96c55f9f2cc7f74</guid>
  <author>
  mahdia...@yahoo.com
  (mahdiarnt)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 06 mar 2010 19:04:28 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
